Suchen und Finden
Service
Focus, Evaluativity, and Antonymy - A Study in the Semantics of Only and its Interaction with Gradable Antonyms
Sam Alxatib
Verlag Springer-Verlag, 2020
ISBN 9783030378066 , 193 Seiten
Format PDF, OL
Kopierschutz Wasserzeichen
Geräte
Mehr zum Inhalt
Focus, Evaluativity, and Antonymy - A Study in the Semantics of Only and its Interaction with Gradable Antonyms
Acknowledgements
7
Contents
8
1 Introduction
10
1.1 Overview
11
1.2 Three Illustrations of Empirical Claim
14
1.2.1 First Illustration: Betting Scenarios
14
1.2.2 Second Illustration: In Fact, and Downward Entailing Contexts
16
1.2.3 Third Illustration: Only as a Weakener
18
1.3 Consequences
18
1.4 Theoretical Implications
20
1.5 Book Overview
24
2 Only and Its Inferences
32
2.1 Chapter Preview
32
2.2 The Semantics of Only
33
2.2.1 The Exclusive Inference of Only
37
2.2.1.1 Scalar Only
39
2.2.1.2 Scalarity and Only's Disjunctive Presupposition
43
2.2.2 Interim Summary
46
2.2.3 Only and Its Scalar Presupposition
47
2.2.4 Only and the Ban Against Its Vacuous Use
53
2.2.5 The Scalar Presupposition as the Ban Against VacuousUse
57
2.3 Chapter Summary
60
3 The Positive Morpheme and Its Interaction with Only
62
3.1 Chapter Preview
62
3.2 Background: Many and Few as Gradable Adjectives
63
3.3 pos and the Evaluativity of Many and Few
66
3.3.1 N as a Modal in the Semantics of pos
71
3.4 Interim Summary
74
3.5 The Interaction of pos and Only: Answering the Missing Readings Question
75
3.6 Theory 1 of the Only-pos Interaction
77
3.6.1 Prediction: Negation
80
3.6.2 Prediction: Modals and Their Monotonicity
82
3.6.3 Section Summary
87
3.7 Theory 2 of the Only-pos Interaction
88
3.8 Chapter Summary
93
3.9 The Antonym-Pair Generalization
94
4 The Proposal
98
4.1 Chapter Preview
98
4.2 The Scoping Account: Decomposing Modified Numerals
99
4.3 The Closure Account
107
4.3.1 Van Benthem's Problem
109
4.3.2 Bypassing van Benthem's Problem by Constraining Alternatives
111
4.3.3 Bypassing van Benthem's Problem by Blind Exclusion
119
4.4 Summary
124
4.4.1 The Existence Inference and the Status of Only'sPrejacent
126
4.4.2 A Remark on the Distribution of Existentially-ClosedParses
127
4.5 Comparison with Other Accounts
128
4.5.1 POS as Comparative: Density?
128
4.5.2 BonomiCasalegno1993
129
4.5.3 Beck2012
134
4.6 Extension to Rarely
138
4.7 Chapter Summary
141
Appendix: Constraint on Formal Alternatives
142
5 Only if, Its Interaction with pos, and Its Scalar Presupposition
145
5.1 Chapter Preview
145
5.2 Only if as Only and a Conditional Prejacent
147
5.3 Only if and pos
154
5.4 Only if and Only's Scalar Presupposition
156
5.5 Chapter Summary
158
6 Conclusions and Extensions
160
6.1 Book Summary
160
6.2 Comparatives
163
6.2.1 Antonymy and the -er Morpheme
164
6.2.2 Subsethood in Measure-Phrase Comparatives
165
6.2.3 Innocent Exclusion and Density
169
6.2.4 LessP
173
6.2.5 Summary
174
6.3 At Least and At Most?
175
6.3.1 Alternativehood of Disjuncts and Association with Only
175
6.4 Another Case: Recently
182
Appendix
184
References
186
Index
192
Shop